The U.S. economy is hurtling
toward a recession if Congress fails to avert a series of tax hikes and budget
cuts due in January, the Congressional Budget Office said Wednesday, warning
that a fiscal impasse would have consequences even more dire than previously
forecast.
The CBO’s gloom sparked another
round of political finger-pointing but failed to cast much of a shadow over
financial markets. That’s because the Federal Reserve is inclined to act
“fairly soon” to boost the slow pace of economic recovery, according to minutes
the central bank released Wednesday. Moreover, new data showed signs of modest
improvement in the housing market.
All of which raises a quandary for
some economists: If Congress is about to steer the nation over what is being
widely dubbed a “fiscal cliff” by failing to agree on a budget, then maybe the
Fed should save its ammunition. Let things get really bad, then act.
“Why do you want to waste your ammo now if you’re going to go off a
fiscal cliff at the beginning of next year?” said Edward Yardeni, president of
Yardeni Research, urging restraint by the Fed. By revving up the economy before
it reaches the cliff, Yardeni said, “maybe [the Fed] thinks we can do an Evel
Knievel and jump right over it. But I don’t get the logic of that.”
But the Fed minutes indicated that
most of the members of its Open Market Committee think otherwise.
“Many members judged that additional monetary accommodation would likely
be warranted fairly soon unless incoming information pointed to a substantial
and sustainable strengthening in the pace of the economic recovery,” said the
minutes of the meeting held July 31 and Aug. 1.
The Fed debated a variety of tools
for boosting growth, including extending its current commitment to ultra-low
federal funds rates past 2014, linking those rates to economic indicators,
launching a new round of purchases of Treasury and mortgage securities and
initiating a scheme to encourage bank lending.
With just 21 / 2 months left until
the presidential election, it may be too late for monetary or fiscal policy to
significantly alter the state of the economy before voters head to the polls.
But actions taken now by the Fed or Congress might still influence whether
voters believe the economy is on the right track.
A steep cliff might not look like
the right direction, though, and the CBO said businesses might delay hiring or
investment if the outlook is threatening.
In its report Wednesday, the CBO
warned that the nation would be plunged into a significant recession during the
first half of next year if Congress fails to avert nearly $500 billion in tax
hikes and spending cuts set to hit in January.
The massive round of New Year’s
belt-tightening — known as the “fiscal cliff” or “Taxmageddon” — would disrupt
recent economic progress, push the unemployment rate back up to 9.1 percent by
the end of 2013 and produce economic conditions “that will probably be
considered a recession,” the nonpartisan CBO said.
The CBO’s economic outlook is
considerably darker than the forecast the agency released in January, when it
predicted that the fiscal cliff would trigger a mild recession in the first
half of 2013, with the economy shrinking by 1.3 percent. Now the agency
foresees a stronger contraction of 2.9 percent in gross domestic product, “similar
in magnitude to the recession of the early 1990s.”
Republicans, including
presidential candidate Mitt Romney, want to postpone the biggest chunk of the
cliff — $331 billion in tax hikes — to give Congress time to overhaul the tax
code.
They have also sought to pin the
scheduled deep cut in military spending on President Obama, working to undercut
his support in electoral battlegrounds where defense spending is key to the
economy. The Republican-led House passed legislation in the spring that would shift
those defense cuts onto domestic programs.
Democrats, including the
president, want to avert tax hikes for those making less than $250,000 a year
but say they will not avert tax increases for those making more, arguing that
higher tax revenues are needed to help close deficits.
House Speaker John A. Boehner
(R-Ohio) said the report underscores why the House in August passed legislation
to avoid tax increases for Americans at all income levels. The Democratic-led
Senate passed a competing bill to halt tax increases only on income less than
$250,000.
“Instead of threatening to drive us off the fiscal cliff and tank our
economy in their quest for higher taxes, I would urge President Obama and
congressional Democrats to work with us to stop the coming tax hike that
threatens our economy and replace the looming defense cuts with common sense
reforms,” Boehner said in a statement.
The White House turned the tables,
responding in a statement that the report “only reinforces the urgent need for
House Republicans to follow the Senate’s lead and pass a bill that gives
middle-class families the confidence that they won’t see their taxes go up at
the beginning of next year.”
The CBO report is gloomier than
the agency’s January forecast in part because of a decision by Congress to
steepen the fiscal cliff by extending a temporary payroll tax break and
emergency unemployment benefits, which are now also set to expire in January.
In addition, CBO analysts have
concluded that the underlying economy is weaker than previously predicted.
“The magnitude of the slowdown we’re discussing next year is
significant,” CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf said at a morning briefing. He
noted that going over the cliff could cost the nation about 2 million jobs.
Elmendorf said the unemployment rate could remain stuck above 8 percent through
2014.
The agency says growth would be
weaker than previously forecast, with the economy expanding by an annualized
rate of just 1.9 percent in the second half of 2013.
Even without a year-end fiscal
crisis, the Fed “anticipates a very gradual pickup in economic activity over
time and a slow decline in unemployment,” with low inflation, according to the
central bank’s minutes.
But the Fed members confessed “an
unusually high level of uncertainty” about the outlook, noting that Europe’s
sovereign-debt and banking crisis and the specter of “a
sharper-than-anticipated fiscal contraction in the United States” meant that
expectations were “tilted to the downside.”
Republicans have been increasingly
vocal about their desire to avert the $55 billion in planned reductions at the
Defense Department in January. In Tampa this week, a drafting committee
inserted language into the party’s official platform calling the defense cut “a
disaster for national security” and blaming Obama for its creation.
The platform does not address the
equally stark $55 billion across-the-board cut scheduled to hit domestic
programs or offer guidance on how to avert the cuts without worsening the
deficits.
While the CBO report outlines the
consequences to the economy of failing to reach a deal to avert the cuts and
tax increases, it also demonstrates the flip side of continued gridlock: one of
the biggest rounds of deficit reduction in modern history.
If Congress does nothing and
allows taxes to rise and spending to fall, the CBO predicts the 2013 deficit
would plummet to $641 billion instead of exceeding $1 trillion for a fifth
straight year.
For the current fiscal year, which
ends Sept. 30, the CBO predicts the deficit will be just over $1.1 trillion,
down slightly from previous projections, thanks to better-than-expected tax
collections and lower spending as the war in Iraq ends and the effects of the
2009 economic stimulus wane.
The national debt is nonetheless
growing apace, with debt owed to outside investors set to hit 73 percent of the
overall economy by the end of September. That’s the highest level in more than
60 years and nearly double the level in 2007, before the onset of the recent
recession.
No comments:
Post a Comment